
Grace Wilhelm has contributed our second entry on chapter 7, and I'll let her tell you about the childhood photo she selected. She wrote that this is "one of my favorites- such a classic picture of our personalities as kids. My older sister (on the left) was always posing and 'perfect', my twin (in the middle) was a very mischievous but funny girl, and then I just hung out with everyone. Oh, and I think we were camping somewhere, which is still our favorite family vacation!"
With all those girls in the family AND family camping vacations, Grace clearly had plenty of time to learn to be social, without being hurried. She's done a terrific job of addressing Elkind's ideas about what children need to learn to be social, so read on and see what you think.
Grace wrote:
I was initially unaware of the socialization ramifications that arise from parenting hurried children. I enjoyed Elkind’s inclusion of different theories in the first section of the chapter. Moreover, I also believe that the family unit, through a combination of many factors, largely socializes children; children develop socially through “‘modeling’ adult behavior” (p. 142), “behavior modification…of rewards and punishment,” “social cognition” (understanding rules), and “identification and internalization” (p. 143). After further reading, I began to agree with Elkind’s contract theory. I wholeheartedly believe the many nuances of expectations parents have for their children are largely unspoken. However, children soak up both spoken and unspoken rules although they may not always immediately model the behavior of their parent or caregiver.
One silly example that I immediately remembered comes from one of my favorite movies. In Baby Mama, Amy Poehler’s character Angie acts very obnoxiously and childishly even as an adult. Unable to open a baby-proofed toilet, Angie proceeds to do her business in the sink. After being caught by her friend, she claims that she didn’t know she was “breaking a rule.” This scene is particularly funny because of this preposterous statement. Children are taught to use the toilet and maintain cleanliness at young ages. By observing and imitating adults, children learn from a young age that using a sink (or anything else for that matter!) instead of the toilet is inappropriate. Therefore, children learn many other social rules simply from observation and imitation. In the same way, adults then inherently know the correct rules and methods of going to the bathroom, making Angie’s actions ridiculous.
Just as contracts are often unspoken, contracts between parents and children are often misread and misunderstood. For instance, as a child, I unconsciously knew that my parents expected me to work hard, excel, and in turn, receive good grades at school. However, sometimes I imagined that my parents had outlandish standards, so I stressed out about particular assignments until I was very worried or exhausted. When I reached adolescence and was in high school, I remember talking to my mom one day about my struggle to succeed in my chemistry class. (I am definitely not gifted in science or math, by the way.) That day, I remember my mom reassured me, told me that I did not have to receive perfect grades, and that she received some poor grades in high school too.
Elkind further ascertains that there are three main contracts that parents have with their children. Freedom is given upon a child’s level of responsibility, achievement and support are provided, and parents also desire loyalty and commitment from children. One thing Elkind mentioned about infants that I found surprising is that they are not only attached to their parents, but they are truly loyal to their parents. One vivid memory I have that demonstrates this truth comes from a conversation my twin sister had with our kindergarten teacher one day. When the classroom electric pencil sharpener was broken, my sister told our teacher, “My dad can fix it! He can fix anything!” Our dad usually fixes things at our home and solves our car problems, so to her, this was a completely valid statement. Her trust and belief in our dad’s ability to fix mechanical problems at home and work imbued in her a sense of pride and complete faith that he could definitely fix the pencil sharpener. Our teacher told our mom the story, noting Rachel’s enthusiasm and complete trust in our dad. Although we have grown up, our dad still fixes most of the mechanical problems at our house, and my loyalty to his ability has developed from a strong commitment to his exceptional skills in repairing mechanical and electronic problems.
Also, parents often offer rewards and support for their children that are potentially harmful for children. Some children may come to believe that they are not successful if their parents do not acknowledge their achievements verbally or with tangible rewards. I must admit that I was sometimes envious of my peers as a child regarding this idea of rewards. Although many of my friends received money for getting good grades, my parents never rewarded me this way. The occasional ‘good job!’ and ‘you are working so diligently!’ were often communicated but never combined with monetary rewards. Looking back, I now know how this type of support is not necessarily beneficial. Although I was initially jealous, I realize my parent’s good intentions and how I benefited from not always receiving support contingent upon rules.
Growing up in a two-parent home, I never faced many of the contractual problems that Elkind described. I experienced stability in my family by having two parents, however, I know that this is not always the case for many children. While some single parents involve other adults to help mentor their children, some may place adult burdens on the shoulders of their children who are unaware of a different reality. Therefore, I wonder how often the help of mentoring adults balances the contracts in a single parent home. In the end, I really enjoyed reading this chapter because it was thought provoking and informative. I now clearly understand the benefits and disadvantages certain parenting practices have on the socialization of children.
Grace, I really identified with the part of your blog entry about being loyal to parents. I think loyalty is different for children that come from a household with both parents. I think it is especially hard for someone to be loyal to both parents when their parents are divorced, as mine are. I really appreciate the fact that my parents have never made it difficult for me to be loyal to both of them at the same time. Your example of thinking your dad could fix anything as a child made me laugh. I have always thought of my dad the same way and still do. Even though he lives out of state and can’t fix things for me, I still find myself calling him to ask how I can fix it myself.
ReplyDelete-Melissa Kyhn
Grace, I also agree with Elkind’s contract theory. While I was growing up, I understood that my parents had certain expectations of me, even though they were not necessarily verbalized. For instance, I performed well in school because that was expected of me. My parents did not praise me when I got good grades; they would not even ask to see my report cards because they knew I was a good student. However, I remember one semester during high school I was devastated because I got a “D” in a math class. It was my first bad grade of my whole school career, and even though I knew that I didn’t have to tell them, I did. Well, they freaked out. I was taken aback by their response because I was not expecting that reaction. I understood that moment, however, that I was required to perform well, even though it had never been verbalized. I had misunderstood my parents and how strongly they felt about my performance in school. I took their lack of interest in my grades as not caring. In actuality, however, it couldn’t have been more important to them.
ReplyDeleteGrace, I also related to Elkind’s thoughts on how children are truly loyal to their parents; and your story about your sister while you both were in kindergarten. One time, when I was in kindergarten, one of the parents (who got around in a power chair) was helping us at a center. She accidentally ran into one of the shelves and broke it. I told my teacher that my dad could fix it, or even build her a new one. I was very loyal to my parents then, and I still am, now. My dad fixed everything for me. I believed, for awhile, that all men were like that. In fact, it influenced the relationships I got into. Much of the way I interact with people, I believe, can be attributed to the way my parents interacted with me.
-Rhiana Guardado
Grace~ I love all of your insights!! I was like you and didn't get rewards for getting good grades, or doing my chores. My mom would verbally reward me but that was it. I like you again, did get jealous at other friends because their parents gave out actual rewards, for example, money, or a new toy, or they got to go somewhere special. I was always jealous of this but now thinking back to those times, I do not think that it would have helped me.
ReplyDeleteSince I did grow up in a single-parent home, I can relate to some of the burdens that are put on the oldest child. I think that mom did the best she could do with what she was given. I was fortunate enough to become very close to my Aunt and Uncle and their 3 girls, so we had other family members around us at all times. I think this helped stabilize and gave us a sense of security.
~Erica Lucero
Grace,
ReplyDeleteI couldn't help but see myself as you describe your sister's response to the broken pencil sharpener. We had a similar upbringing as, to this day, my dad still fixes all my car problems or loose things around the house. When you said that contracts within the family can sometimes be misread or misinterpreted, I remembered when my brother wanted to pierce his ear. It was always an understood rule that we were not allowed to get a piercing without permission, but for my brother, he just wasn't allowed period. While visiting an aunt in San Jose, we all went to a fair and my brother just begged and pleaded for my parents to allow him to pierce his ear; finally they caved. I can remember thinking, “Why even have rules if my parents are just going to break them?” I was confused for a while after that happened, but then we had a family discussion and it clicked: It's not that all rules are bad or bendable, but some can be broken with little consequence. Moreover, I realized that setting rules and having contracts is a good thing, and a discussion is needed when one of the members of the family wants to break a contract. They must have evidence and support for why they would like to break that contract or rule. I feel it set my brother and me up to be good logical thinkers.